-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test(blockifier): uncover an error in test_l1_handler in the case of transaction version three #2146
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
Artifacts upload triggered. View details here |
Artifacts upload triggered. View details here |
Benchmark movements: |
3f82a9f
to
d48cc06
Compare
bcaf5fe
to
98dba2f
Compare
Artifacts upload triggered. View details here |
d48cc06
to
8b70d13
Compare
98dba2f
to
65d1f92
Compare
Artifacts upload triggered. View details here |
65d1f92
to
a01881b
Compare
8b70d13
to
5203a58
Compare
…transaction version three
a01881b
to
dc6bece
Compare
Artifacts upload triggered. View details here |
Artifacts upload triggered. View details here |
Artifacts upload triggered. View details here |
Artifacts upload triggered. View details here |
Artifacts upload triggered. View details here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 2 files at r2.
Reviewable status: 1 of 4 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @giladchase and @meship-starkware)
The test
test_l1_handler
fails for:use_kzg_da = true
andversion = TransactionVersion::THREE
.I am unsure if it is supposed to pass - but the test fails only on incorrect
actual_fee == expected_actual_fee
in the last assertion of the test.Please tell me if it is acceptable for this test to fail and if we should avoid this flow - or if we should keep this test - and in that case - fix it or fix the code.